Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Place An Ad | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

Sat 9:40pm: Obama a skeet shooter? See new White House photo

February 2, 2013

WASHINGTON — Two days before President Barack Obama's first trip outside Washington to promote his gun-control proposals, the White House tried to settle a brewing mystery when it released a photo t......

« Back to Article

 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(265)

Marmel

Feb-07-13 8:14 AM

Defeat, I read your politico fact list and it is bogus once you get into the details of most of the “promises”. Like healthcare and how I explained that one. Democrats promised to lower costs and expand coverage without affecting the care of those that already have it and like it, OK. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT? That promise was not kept. Even though political fact takes the subjective, bias approach of, “they said they would get a healthcare bill and they did, promise kept!”. That is BS, they promised outcomes via a bill, the bill does the exact opposite of what was promised. PROMISE NOT KEPT. Personally I think it is hilarious that you are basing your argument on politicofact. Who fact checks them? You know they are the same people who bring you the daily propaganda and the daily spin.

0 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

unitedfortruth

Feb-07-13 1:47 AM

also, he didnt end the war in iraq.

how about this new one...

A cellphone company whose top executive has close ties to President Obama lobbied for and won a piece of a major new government push to provide Internet service to low-income job-seekers, even though critics say the company’s smartphones are poorly suited to the task of helping those in the program find work."---washingtontimes

so, obammy is giving away smart phones to the jobless with our money, paying for them to have acces to the internet also because i want to pay my cell phone and internet bill and theirs too because they are jobless, so they can use the phone to get on the internet to find a job.

question? if i have my cell phone bill and my internet service charge and the rest of my living expenses paid, why would i use my new phone to get a job?

more waste.

1 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

unitedfortruth

Feb-07-13 1:42 AM

sbb5...technically, you are correct. i did say not one promise. LOL!

healthcare, he lied about. let me say that first. he definitely changed it though.

2nd...not an obammy hater. hes just bum. he works for corporate and banking interests. the only reason i bring him up because he is just as big of a scumbag as bush, and if you cant see hes a pile of waste then you wont be able to see the other things im trying to tell you.

lastly, when i said he kept no promises,, i meant the big ones that matter to all americans. you know, the ones that actually matter for our future and the future of this country. the ones you dismiss for lilly medfetter.

0 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Ihateusblues

Feb-06-13 10:47 PM

Usblues, your attempt at humor is not fact based. First off, I was celebrating New Years at home with my girl friend and a few others at our HOUSE! YOU were on here and the proof is in the post! Nice try though.

2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Ihateusblues

Feb-06-13 9:37 PM

Defeat, think about it: they are bitter sore racist losers hiding behind a screen name. Some on here are so devoid of a social life that they were on here at midnight on New Year's Eve(usblues). Don't let them raise your blood pressure. I read everything you posted and gave you an agree!

2 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

DefeatSBB5

Feb-06-13 8:33 PM

There is no reasoning with you people.

I quoted an Obama-hater who said on this blog that the President has not kept ONE promise.

NOT ONE, says the hater!

Nada!

I then proceeded to enumerate several that I KNEW were kept, and to refer readers to the Politifact website, which lists THIRTEEN PAGES of promises made, and the speeches or press releases that carried them PRIOR to the election, as well as the disposition of EACH ONE.

But that's not good enough for the Obama-haters, you see, because it refutes the number one reason for their lives -- namely, that Obama delenda est.

If that's the case, this entire blog is useless.

2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

AnarchoCapitalist

Feb-06-13 8:15 PM

Sandy Hook DA cites 'potential suspects,' fears witness safety

Connecticut State's Attorney Stephen Sedensky has argued that unsealing warrants in the Sandy Hook case might "seriously jeopardize" the investigation by disclosing information known only to other "potential suspects."

Sedensky said that unsealing the warrants would also:

"identify persons cooperating with the investigation, thus possibly jeopardizing their personal safety and well-being."

The statement by the CT prosecutor's office is the first indication from state authorities that Adam Lanza may have not acted alone.

The plot just keeps getting thicker, and haters gotta keep on hating. Your rulers tell you what to believe, and what your talking points must be to perpetuate your directed history of events. How proud will you be when you discover you're nothing but a tool of corruption?

0 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Marmel

Feb-06-13 4:53 PM

Maybe instead of guns we should outlaw liberalism.

2 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Marmel

Feb-06-13 4:52 PM

“He told the FBI that he wanted to kill anti-gay targets and went to the law center’s website for ideas [emphasis added],” the report adds. The shooter also told FBI agents that it was his intention to “kill as many as possible and smear the Chick-Fil-A sandwiches in victims’ faces, and kill the guard.”

1 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Marmel

Feb-06-13 4:51 PM

Is this on CNN:

The Family Research Council shooter, Floyd Lee Corkins II, on Wednesday pleaded guilty to charges that include assault with intent to kill and committing an act of terrorism. Shockingly enough, Corkins told FBI agents that he chose FRC as a target based on the liberal Southern Poverty Law Center’s “hate map.” For those of you who are unaware, the Southern Poverty Law Center has designated FRC a “hate group” because of the conservative organization’s position on gay marriage:

0 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Marmel

Feb-06-13 4:32 PM

The act says someone can bring suit whenever about any time in history as long as someone received a payment from the firm in the last six months. So someone can sue for something ten years ago. How do you defend against that? How do you prove productivity? Statutes of limitation serve many reasons one of them is to stop frivolous lawsuits in which evidence my no longer exist.

You say this is about fairness but companies will and I will repeat that, will take this into account when interviewing women. They will put the company first and mitigate potential risk where it is perceived. The outcome of this act may be the direct opposite of what was intended.

0 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Marmel

Feb-06-13 4:31 PM

J today – You assume the “fair pay act” is simply going to make everything fair because that is the title. You assume because I have misgivings about the act that I am not for fairness. You are incorrect on both counts.

0 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

jtoday

Feb-06-13 3:25 PM

"Lilly Ledbetter – You are correct but this will hurt women and business alike. Evident by the unemployment rate among women."

You cannot be serious about this statement. Good businesses realized years ago that treating people fairly and respectfully can only make things better.

That rules works in everyday life also.

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Marmel

Feb-06-13 2:59 PM

Actually defeat, technically you are wrong. Let me explain. Healthcare: He said they would make it more affordable and expand coverage. Premiums have and will continue to rise. Cost for government coverage is on avg going to be higher than it is today says the IRS. Lilly Ledbetter – You are correct but this will hurt women and business alike. Evident by the unemployment rate among women. Political fact is not fact. I think what you and political fact don’t get is the outcomes that were promised are not the outcomes that are happening when the rubber meets the road. I look at it like this. If the healthcare bill didn’t address cost but actually made it more expensive and at the same time puts government between patients and doctors while decreasing quality than what was the point. Promise of dealing with the cost of healthcare NOT KEPT. Political fact calls it kept because he passed the bill without addressing what the bill was advertised to do. I am don’t call passing a bill a su

0 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

DefeatSBB5

Feb-06-13 2:45 PM

"this man [Obama] has not kept one promise. LOL! i mean he has held to nothing he said he would do. just like bush. LOL"

Actually, right off the top of my head, he HAS kept many promises.

For example, he said would reform the health insurance in this country -- and he DID, though he should have, at least in my not-so-humble opinion, simply expanded Medicare. So, now, because of Obamacare, insurers CANNOT deny coverage to people with "pre-existing" conditions, nor can they cut kids off (until age 26), nor can they drop you from coverage if your illness or injury gets too expensive.

So THERE!

He signed the Lilly Ledbetter Act in '09, as promised, right after he took office.

So THERE again.

In FACT, Politifact lists 13 pages of promises made and kept, citing the speech or press-release in which each promise was made, and the final disposition of each.

13 PAGES!

Just thought you'd like to know the actual truth.

2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Marmel

Feb-06-13 1:11 PM

According to Dosie the constitution is no longer the law. The constitution provides language that renders it viod. The supreme court is not above the constitution DOS. They can't "legallY" in accordance with our rights do what you say. You know it, I know it. They can make unconstitutional laws valid and enforce them. But lets not pretend it is "legal". Not in the sense freedom, liberty, unalianable rights. If your ascertion were accurate than nothing in the constitution, bill of rights, D of I holds an authority what so ever. Are you so dumb to believe that we would accept you BS. We know the difference, do U?

0 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Marmel

Feb-06-13 1:03 PM

Ya dosie bot. Put down the pamphlet and think for yourself.

Dosie is on the phone right now with tech support. "um, how do i reply to this one". Ok "Tell them they haven't walked the walk and you have"

"Tell them all guns can be legally oulawed because of the last supreme court ruling."

Just BS after BS.

0 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

unitedfortruth

Feb-06-13 12:57 PM

marmel...think bigger.

they dont need registration or background checks. all they have to do is start a massive debate on it. then, by use of internet security hackers, they can find out who has the guns just from people who comment they have them.

0 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

unitedfortruth

Feb-06-13 12:55 PM

the adversary?

dosie, why dont you explain who the "adversary" is obammy is talking about?

0 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Marmel

Feb-06-13 12:54 PM

united. That fits the bill for Hank and Dosie for sure. Image spending your 1 life, your only time on the planet, letting others program your thoughts. What a waste!

0 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

unitedfortruth

Feb-06-13 12:52 PM

anybody want a job with Raytheon?

right from their website....

Cyber Warriors Wanted

President Obama recently announced that cybersecurity is one of our country’s most urgent national security priorities. Raytheon is answering that call by hiring more cyber warriors this year to help fight the digital cyber war.

Our Raytheon cyber warriors play offense and defense, and know how the adversary thinks and can adopt their perspective. They understand the real engineering beneath the interfaces. They also can design and create new software, as well as reverse-engineer and analyze software and hardware created by someone else.

1 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Marmel

Feb-06-13 12:45 PM

"I don't play YOUR game with the multible names, little one."

Got it Dos! <thumbs up>

1 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Marmel

Feb-06-13 12:43 PM

“Death or serious injury to ICE officers and agents appears more acceptable to ICE, DHS, and Administration leadership, than the public complaints that would be lodged by special interest groups representing illegal aliens,” Crane

Another quote from the ICE Union Boss. This is getting intresting. Maybe more will be on C span tonight.

0 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

reallytiredofit

Feb-06-13 12:28 PM

And why would anyone need instructions or training to marginalize someone as totally ineffective as you are? Do you actually believe that ANYONE but your own selves, reads or cares about what you post? Don't flatter yourself you don't deserve it.

0 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

reallytiredofit

Feb-06-13 12:25 PM

I don't play YOUR game with the multible names, little one.

0 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 25 of 265 comments Show More Comments
 
 

 

I am looking for: